Top 10 reasons it's useless to try and educate Kittylitta - aka, the boy in the drool bubble.

10. Not surprisingly, lives in southern Indiana - as most trolls reside near bridges.

9. Claims to be an adult but has the reading comprehension, thought cohesion and spelling ability of an 8 year old. A dumb 8 year old.

8. Rails against the so called 47%, however is too obtuse to realize that he is part of that group. Also is too obtuse to know what "obtuse" means.

7. Though he says he is for a strong middle class, he believes unions are evil and it members are "thugs". He would rather buy foreign than buy a union made product. Guess he meant China's middle class.

6. Thinks Obamacare is a socialist takeover of medicine and not a big wet kiss to the insurance business by delivering them 50 million new customers.

5. Believes that the government check he receives is somehow different than other entitlement payments. Though befuddled by most concepts, clearly understands the concept of "rationalization".

4. He is too dim to realize that as a teabag conservative, most of those figures he looks up to, were the progressives of their day (see: Founders)

3. He believes that they poor got that way by being stupid and lazy while those privileged from birth have achieved success all on their own. Thinks that it's perfectly acceptable for the wealthy to vote their economic interests but, the poor should not. Oh, and the poor shouldn't breed either.

2. He could not articulate the principles of socialism if his life depended on it but, is convinced that Obama is one. He's probably From Kenya too.

1. He is willfully stupid. Regardless of facts to the contrary, he will cling to pure opinion and use rhetoric instead of well-thought response as defense when the fallacy of his "logic" is exposed. He constructed his drool bubble to specifically keep his opinions in, and those pesky facts out.

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bobby P's Ghost on January 17, 2013 at 4:15pm

The way that I (and everyone else that you've matched your one wit with) have won all of the arguments, is by citing support for our positions. The only support you have? Your overworked couch...

I haven't posted any of those things that you've listed - so you need to try again. I guess when you are being clowned by so many people at once; it's difficult to remember who said what. BTW, winning arguments and calling you names are mutually exclusive things.

You keep referring to me not "answering a question". Even though I think you have me confused with someone else much smarter than you, feel free to ask it again. I'll be happy to get back with you though, I'm sure that you won't be bright enough to understand the answer...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kittykilla on January 17, 2013 at 8:40pm

I , Unlike you dont have to go web sites to get "opinions". I can understand and reason what is going on in this country. I asked you about fast and furious and you never gave a direct answer. I asked when did raising taxes become an economic policy. Still no answer. Just rhetoric and na$me calling. No, i dont have you confused with anyone else. You are confused because kept asking someone else to answer for you. Nown the only support you have.... EBT, welfare, section 8

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobby P's Ghost on January 17, 2013 at 10:20pm

Do you understand the difference between "opinion" and "evidence"? Of course you don't go to web sites for your opinions - those have already been instilled in you by those fair and balanced folks at fox news and, el rushbo perhaps. But just because you can parrot what they've said, don't think for a second that you understand or reason your way around these topics.

You're right, I did not speak to you about fast and furious - I was doing my best to ignore you at that time - but I decided to go back to clowning on you directly. That said though (and based on your vague reference above) I'm still not clear what part of it you want me to help you understand. It seems that Yanks gave you plenty of information to read - what are you still unclear about?

Regarding your other comment, we've gone around that mulberry bush quite enough. No, raising taxes is not an economic policy, it is a tax policy - that's why the word "tax" is used. We talked plenty about what Obama's economic policies were and just because you don't agree with them, that doesn't mean that they are invalid. That's typically where things land with you - you don't agree with anything outside of your narrative, so you try to completely discredit the citation, or the evidence, or the source. It really is quite an intellectually dishonest way to discuss issues...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kittykilla on January 17, 2013 at 11:46pm

The only Obama economic policy you have given me was the stimulus package which isnt a policy at all. Dont try and avoid all the questions as you usually have. Try to give some vague excuse as to how you have tried to answer anything. You answer everything as most of your kind do. " Oh you got a your info from fox or rush". Always trying to discredit. If that doesnt work then I am an extremist or racist

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobby P's Ghost on January 18, 2013 at 12:50am

Well by all means, if I'm wrong about where you've gotten your "opinions" please set me straight. As you've (to date) provided nothing beyond the usual Sean Hannity pablum and, not in any way provided any insight or accredited published material supporting your "opinions", it makes it difficult to believe that they are anything but recycled talking points of other people. You feel discredited? Then provide some evidence supporting your position. I've not labeled you an extremist, an idiot for sure, but I've not said you're an extremist. That said, your positions on the poor certainly (even in the kindest view) bump up against racism.

Here's a question for you. Tell me again (from an strictly economic perspective) why wasn't the stimulus package an economic policy? Side question - what were Ronald Reagan's top five economic policies during his two terms?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobby P's Ghost on January 18, 2013 at 12:55am

BTW, this (my) discussion is at - 170 views, and multiple posters. Your's had what, 30 and just you?

I win again in the race to be interesting. You still take the crown of "Most Insignificant".

HAR-HAR...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kittykilla on January 18, 2013 at 7:45am

No...I win if you respond which yu stated you wouldn't do again.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by GO Yankees on January 18, 2013 at 8:30am

Check that,

Killa has become obsessed.....he needs to move on.

Bobby P's Ghost said:

BTW, this (my) discussion is at - 170 views, and multiple posters. Your's had what, 30 and just you?

I win again in the race to be interesting. You still take the crown of "Most Insignificant".

HAR-HAR...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kittykilla on January 18, 2013 at 8:48am

uhhhhhhhhhhhhh...yea.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bobby P's Ghost on January 18, 2013 at 11:01am

Ladies and gentlemen, we are witnessing someone so starved for a "win" in his otherwise unrewarding life, that he counts being responded to, as a victory.

It's really quite sad...

kittykilla said: